[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1561121745.5154.37.camel@lca.pw>
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2019 08:55:45 -0400
From: Qian Cai <cai@....pw>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, glider@...gle.com, cl@...ux.com,
penberg@...nel.org, rientjes@...gle.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] slub: play init_on_free=1 well with SLAB_RED_ZONE
On Thu, 2019-06-20 at 18:19 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 06:14:33PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 03:28:01PM -0400, Qian Cai wrote:
> > > diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> > > index a384228ff6d3..787971d4fa36 100644
> > > --- a/mm/slub.c
> > > +++ b/mm/slub.c
> > > @@ -1437,7 +1437,7 @@ static inline bool slab_free_freelist_hook(struct
> > > kmem_cache *s,
> > > do {
> > > object = next;
> > > next = get_freepointer(s, object);
> > > - memset(object, 0, s->size);
> > > + memset(object, 0, s->object_size);
> >
> > I think this should be more dynamic -- we _do_ want to wipe all
> > of object_size in the case where it's just alignment and padding
> > adjustments. If redzones are enabled, let's remove that portion only.
>
> (Sorry, I meant: all of object's "size", not object_size.)
>
I suppose Alexander is going to revise the series anyway, so he can probably
take care of the issue here in the new version as well. Something like this,
memset(object, 0, s->object_size);
memset(object, 0, s->size - s->inuse);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists