linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] timekeeping: add missing non-

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAK8P3a1P8dqGC0cTWZWZavn9VeLWQ80xAHu3Xfh-e08N97f5dg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 21 Jun 2019 16:40:44 +0200
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:     "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] timekeeping: add missing non-_ns functions for fast accessors

On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 4:33 PM Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@...c4.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 4:29 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> > Typo: you have the same function names listed twice here,
> > one of them should be ktime_get_mono_fast() instead of
> > ktime_get_mono_fast_ns().
>
> Nice catch. Vim twitches gone crazy.
>
> > Also, we might want to rename ktime_get_boot_fast_ns()
> > to ktime_get_boottime_fast_ns in the process. It seems there
> > is only a single caller.
>
> And tai -> clocktai on the others. I can send a followup patch to
> unify all those after this set.

Yes, that's probably best.

       Arnd