[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1906211651550.3740@hadrien>
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2019 16:52:16 +0200 (CEST)
From: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@...6.fr>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@...g.fr>,
Coccinelle <cocci@...teme.lip6.fr>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ding Xiang <dingxiang@...s.chinamobile.com>
Subject: Re: Coccinelle: Add a SmPL script for the reconsideration of redundant
dev_err() calls
On Fri, 21 Jun 2019, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > I still don't see the point of specifying return. Why not just S, where S
> > is a statement metavariable?
>
> Do you find the following SmPL change specification more appropriate?
It looks better.
>
> @deletion depends on patch@
> expression e;
> statement s;
> @@
> e = devm_ioremap_resource(...);
> if (IS_ERR(e))
> (
> -{
> - dev_err(...);
> s
> -}
> |
> {
> <+...
> - dev_err(...);
> ...+>
> }
> )
Powered by blists - more mailing lists