linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] iio: cros_ec: Add sign vector in core for backward compatibility

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAPUE2utxbVPyj6F2uV95CmT7aF0=ZyNN7bS97ynL1quFiDq+FQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 20 Jun 2019 19:25:16 -0700
From:   Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@...omium.org>
To:     Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc:     Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
        Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>,
        Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>,
        Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>,
        linux-iio <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Fabien Lahoudere <fabien.lahoudere@...labora.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] iio: cros_ec: Add sign vector in core for backward compatibility

On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 2:46 PM Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 11:53 AM Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@...omium.org> wrote:
> >
> > To allow cros_ec iio core library to be used with legacy device, add a
> > vector to rotate sensor data if necessary: legacy devices are not
> > reporting data in HTML5/Android sensor referential.
> >
> > TEST=On veyron minnie, check chrome detect tablet mode and rotate
> > screen in tablet mode.
>
> TEST= doesn't belong in an upstream patch.
>
>
> > Signed-off-by: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@...omium.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/iio/common/cros_ec_sensors/cros_ec_sensors_core.c | 5 ++++-
> >  include/linux/iio/common/cros_ec_sensors_core.h           | 1 +
> >  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/common/cros_ec_sensors/cros_ec_sensors_core.c b/drivers/iio/common/cros_ec_sensors/cros_ec_sensors_core.c
> > index 719a0df5aeeb..1b2e7a8242ad 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/common/cros_ec_sensors/cros_ec_sensors_core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/common/cros_ec_sensors/cros_ec_sensors_core.c
> > @@ -66,8 +66,10 @@ int cros_ec_sensors_core_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
> >                 }
> >                 state->type = state->resp->info.type;
> >                 state->loc = state->resp->info.location;
> > -       }
> >
> > +               /* Set sign vector, only used for backward compatibility. */
> > +               memset(state->sign, 1, CROS_EC_SENSOR_MAX_AXIS);
> > +       }
> >         return 0;
>
> Normally there's a blank line before the "return".  There was before
> your patch.  Why did you remove it?  It'll make your diff cleaner if
> you keep it.
Will fix these issues in next patch.
>
> Also, should you be basing your patch atop +Fabien's series?  I notice
> you got a conflict when you picked this into the Chrome OS tree, but
> maybe you wouldn't have if you had based atop
> <https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1090463/> AKA
> <https://lkml.kernel.org/r/ac3cdc104e59565d178dfa86f2727045224dc4da.1560848479.git.fabien.lahoudere@collabora.com>
I did not based on top of Fabien's patches because this change is
orthogonal to Fabien's. Moreover a new set of patches is needed as the
attributes added (min_freq, max_freq) do not match the current sysfs
ABI.

Gwendal.
>
>
> -Doug