linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V31 06/25] kexec_file: split KEXEC_VERIFY_SIG into KEXEC_SIG and KEXEC_SIG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACdnJuvmU8PcRztTYRHes-O3QVwiXy_PQvP9AP=B=byX4Pu3uA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 21 Jun 2019 13:13:39 -0700
From:   Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...gle.com>
To:     Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>
Cc:     James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>, Jiri Bohac <jbohac@...e.cz>,
        Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
        kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
        LSM List <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V31 06/25] kexec_file: split KEXEC_VERIFY_SIG into
 KEXEC_SIG and KEXEC_SIG_FORCE

On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 11:34 PM Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com> wrote:
> Force use -EKEYREJECTED is odd,  why not just use original "ret"?

Fair question. Jiri, any feelings here?