[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACdnJut=J1YTpM4s6g5XWCEs+=X0Jvf8otfMg+w=_oqSZmf01Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2019 13:18:03 -0700
From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...gle.com>
To: Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>
Cc: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>, Jiri Bohac <jbohac@...e.cz>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
LSM List <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V31 07/25] kexec_file: Restrict at runtime if the kernel
is locked down
On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 11:43 PM Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On 03/26/19 at 11:27am, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > From: Jiri Bohac <jbohac@...e.cz>
> >
> > When KEXEC_SIG is not enabled, kernel should not load images through
> > kexec_file systemcall if the kernel is locked down.
> >
> > [Modified by David Howells to fit with modifications to the previous patch
> > and to return -EPERM if the kernel is locked down for consistency with
> > other lockdowns. Modified by Matthew Garrett to remove the IMA
> > integration, which will be replaced by integrating with the IMA
> > architecture policy patches.]
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jiri Bohac <jbohac@...e.cz>
> > Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...gle.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Jiri Bohac <jbohac@...e.cz>
> > cc: kexec@...ts.infradead.org
> > ---
> > kernel/kexec_file.c | 6 ++++++
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/kexec_file.c b/kernel/kexec_file.c
> > index 67f3a866eabe..a1cc37c8b43b 100644
> > --- a/kernel/kexec_file.c
> > +++ b/kernel/kexec_file.c
> > @@ -239,6 +239,12 @@ kimage_file_prepare_segments(struct kimage *image, int kernel_fd, int initrd_fd,
> > }
> >
> > ret = 0;
> > +
> > + if (kernel_is_locked_down(reason, LOCKDOWN_INTEGRITY)) {
> > + ret = -EPERM;
> > + goto out;
> > + }
> > +
>
> Checking here is late, it would be good to move the check to earlier
> code around below code:
> /* We only trust the superuser with rebooting the system. */
> if (!capable(CAP_SYS_BOOT) || kexec_load_disabled)
> return -EPERM;
I don't think so - we want it to be possible to load images if they
have a valid signature.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists