[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190621203249.3909-1-Jason@zx2c4.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2019 22:32:47 +0200
From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH v5 1/3] timekeeping: use proper ktime_add when adding nsecs in coarse offset
While this doesn't actually amount to a real difference, since the macro
evaluates to the same thing, every place else operates on ktime_t using
these functions, so let's not break the pattern.
Fixes: e3ff9c3678b4 ("timekeeping: Repair ktime_get_coarse*() granularity")
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@...c4.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
---
kernel/time/timekeeping.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
index 44b726bab4bd..d911c8470149 100644
--- a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
@@ -819,7 +819,7 @@ ktime_t ktime_get_coarse_with_offset(enum tk_offsets offs)
} while (read_seqcount_retry(&tk_core.seq, seq));
- return base + nsecs;
+ return ktime_add_ns(base, nsecs);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ktime_get_coarse_with_offset);
--
2.21.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists