[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190622060444.GA6975@minwooim-desktop>
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2019 15:04:44 +0900
From: Minwoo Im <minwoo.im.dev@...il.com>
To: Matias Bjørling <mb@...htnvm.io>
Cc: axboe@...com, hch@....de, damien.lemoal@....com,
chaitanya.kulkarni@....com, dmitry.fomichev@....com,
ajay.joshi@....com, aravind.ramesh@....com,
martin.petersen@...cle.com, James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com,
agk@...hat.com, snitzer@...hat.com, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
dm-devel@...hat.com,
Matias Bjørling <matias.bjorling@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] block: add zone open, close and finish support
On 19-06-21 15:07:08, Matias Bjørling wrote:
> @@ -226,6 +228,9 @@ int blkdev_reset_zones(struct block_device *bdev,
> if (!blk_queue_is_zoned(q))
> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>
> + if (!op_is_zone_mgmt_op(op))
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
nitpick: -EINVAL looks better to return as Damien pointed out.
Otherwise it looks good to me:
Reviewed-by: Minwoo Im <minwoo.im.dev@...il.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists