[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0gtG5mcBwMB7mZ2aooBnJmL7fmx=QpoeMTDpbbHrue6OA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2019 11:04:32 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Nikolaus Voss <nv@...n.de>,
"Moore, Robert" <robert.moore@...el.com>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
"Schmauss, Erik" <erik.schmauss@...el.com>,
Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:ACPI COMPONENT ARCHITECTURE (ACPICA)" <devel@...ica.org>,
"linux-leds@...r.kernel.org" <linux-leds@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PWM List <linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] ACPI: Resolve objects on host-directed table loads
On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 8:49 AM Nikolaus Voss <nv@...n.de> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 19 Jun 2019, Moore, Robert wrote:
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Nikolaus Voss [mailto:nv@...n.de]
> >> Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2019 2:31 AM
> >> To: Moore, Robert <robert.moore@...el.com>
> >> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org>; Rafael J. Wysocki
> >> <rjw@...ysocki.net>; Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>; Schmauss, Erik
> >> <erik.schmauss@...el.com>; Jacek Anaszewski
> >> <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>; Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>; Dan Murphy
> >> <dmurphy@...com>; Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>; ACPI Devel
> >> Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>; open list:ACPI COMPONENT
> >> ARCHITECTURE (ACPICA) <devel@...ica.org>; linux-leds@...r.kernel.org;
> >> Linux PWM List <linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org>; Linux Kernel Mailing List
> >> <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>; nikolaus.voss@...wensteinmedical.de
> >> Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 1/3] ACPI: Resolve objects on host-directed table
> >> loads
> >>
> >> Hi Bob,
> >>
> >> On Tue, 18 Jun 2019, Moore, Robert wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> From: Moore, Robert
> >>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2019 1:25 PM
> >>>> To: 'Nikolaus Voss' <nv@...n.de>
> >>>> Cc: 'Rafael J. Wysocki' <rafael@...nel.org>; 'Rafael J. Wysocki'
> >>>> <rjw@...ysocki.net>; 'Len Brown' <lenb@...nel.org>; Schmauss, Erik
> >>>> <erik.schmauss@...el.com>; 'Jacek Anaszewski'
> >>>> <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>; 'Pavel Machek' <pavel@....cz>; 'Dan
> >>>> Murphy' <dmurphy@...com>; 'Thierry Reding'
> >>>> <thierry.reding@...il.com>; 'ACPI Devel Maling List'
> >>>> <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>; 'open list:ACPI COMPONENT ARCHITECTURE
> >>>> (ACPICA)' <devel@...ica.org>; 'linux- leds@...r.kernel.org' <linux-
> >> leds@...r.kernel.org>; 'Linux PWM List'
> >>>> <linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org>; 'Linux Kernel Mailing List' <linux-
> >>>> kernel@...r.kernel.org>
> >>>> Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 1/3] ACPI: Resolve objects on host-directed
> >>>> table loads
> >>>>
> >>>> If it is in fact the AcpiLoadTable interface that is incorrect, that
> >>>> of course is different. I'll check that out next.
> >>>>
> >>> [Moore, Robert]
> >>>
> >>> Yes, this is the issue, not specifically the Load() operator, but the
> >>> AcpiLoadTable interface only.
> >>
> >> thanks for checking this out. So what is the conclusion? Is my fix of
> >> AcpiLoadTable() sufficient or do we need a different solution?
> >>
> >> Niko
> >>
> >
> >
> > Your change is in the correct area. We want to do something like this, however:
> >
> > diff --git a/source/components/executer/exconfig.c b/source/components/executer/exconfig.c
> > index 84a058ada..eba1a6d28 100644
> > --- a/source/components/executer/exconfig.c
> > +++ b/source/components/executer/exconfig.c
> > @@ -342,10 +342,9 @@ AcpiExLoadTableOp (
> > return_ACPI_STATUS (Status);
> > }
> >
> > - /* Complete the initialization/resolution of package objects */
> > + /* Complete the initialization/resolution of new objects */
> >
> > - Status = AcpiNsWalkNamespace (ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE, ACPI_ROOT_OBJECT,
> > - ACPI_UINT32_MAX, 0, AcpiNsInitOnePackage, NULL, NULL, NULL);
> > + AcpiNsInitializeObjects ();
> >
> > /* Parameter Data (optional) */
> >
> > @@ -620,10 +619,11 @@ AcpiExLoadOp (
> > return_ACPI_STATUS (Status);
> > }
> >
> > - /* Complete the initialization/resolution of package objects */
> > + /* Complete the initialization/resolution of new objects */
> >
> > - Status = AcpiNsWalkNamespace (ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE, ACPI_ROOT_OBJECT,
> > - ACPI_UINT32_MAX, 0, AcpiNsInitOnePackage, NULL, NULL, NULL);
> > + AcpiExExitInterpreter ();
> > + AcpiNsInitializeObjects ();
> > + AcpiExEnterInterpreter ();
> >
> > /* Store the DdbHandle into the Target operand */
> >
> > diff --git a/source/components/tables/tbxfload.c b/source/components/tables/tbxfload.c
> > index 217d54bf0..1e17db6c8 100644
> > --- a/source/components/tables/tbxfload.c
> > +++ b/source/components/tables/tbxfload.c
> > @@ -479,6 +479,13 @@ AcpiLoadTable (
> > ACPI_INFO (("Host-directed Dynamic ACPI Table Load:"));
> > Status = AcpiTbInstallAndLoadTable (ACPI_PTR_TO_PHYSADDR (Table),
> > ACPI_TABLE_ORIGIN_EXTERNAL_VIRTUAL, FALSE, &TableIndex);
> > + if (ACPI_SUCCESS (Status))
> > + {
> > + /* Complete the initialization/resolution of new objects */
> > +
> > + AcpiNsInitializeObjects ();
> > + }
> > +
> > return_ACPI_STATUS (Status);
> > }
>
> Ok, I see your are taking this up (I was a bit unsure after your previous
> post). Thanks,
The $subject patch has been queued for 5.3. If I should drop it,
please let me know.
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists