linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -next v2] drm/amdgpu: return 'ret' in amdgpu_pmu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0ab82cdb0bec30e7e431f106f8e0e9d141491555.camel@perches.com>
Date:   Sat, 22 Jun 2019 11:13:26 -0700
From:   Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:     Mao Wenan <maowenan@...wei.com>, airlied@...ux.ie, daniel@...ll.ch,
        alexander.deucher@....com, christian.koenig@....com,
        David1.Zhou@....com, dan.carpenter@...cle.com, julia.lawall@...6.fr
Cc:     kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jonathan Kim <jonathan.kim@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v2] drm/amdgpu: return 'ret' in amdgpu_pmu_init

On Sat, 2019-06-22 at 21:05 +0800, Mao Wenan wrote:
> There is one warning:
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_pmu.c: In function ‘amdgpu_pmu_init’:
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_pmu.c:249:6: warning: variable ‘ret’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
>   int ret = 0;
[]
>  v1->v2: change the subject for this patch; change the indenting when it calls init_pmu_by_type; use the value 'ret' in
>  amdgpu_pmu_init().
[]
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_pmu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_pmu.c
[]
> @@ -252,8 +252,8 @@ int amdgpu_pmu_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
>  	case CHIP_VEGA20:
>  		/* init df */
>  		ret = init_pmu_by_type(adev, df_v3_6_attr_groups,
> -				       "DF", "amdgpu_df", PERF_TYPE_AMDGPU_DF,
> -				       DF_V3_6_MAX_COUNTERS);
> +							   "DF", "amdgpu_df", PERF_TYPE_AMDGPU_DF,
> +							   DF_V3_6_MAX_COUNTERS);

trivia:

The indentation change seems superfluous and
appears to make the code harder to read.

You could also cc Jonathan Kim who wrote all of this.