[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c9602b72-7dbb-47ad-97ef-9348d7e1c3e9@collabora.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2019 18:51:06 -0300
From: André Almeida <andrealmeid@...labora.com>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-media@...r.kernel.org, hverkuil@...all.nl,
helen.koike@...labora.com, kernel@...labora.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] media: vimc: stream: add missing function
documentation
Hello Mauro,
On 6/21/19 6:17 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Mon, 17 Jun 2019 10:32:20 -0300
> André Almeida <andrealmeid@...labora.com> escreveu:
>
>> Add comments at vimc_streamer_s_stream and vimc_streamer_thread, making
>> the vimc-stream totally documented.
> I'm applying it right now.
>
> Yet, if this is fully documented, IMO you should add it to
> Documentation/media/v4l-drivers, replacing the comments to kernel-doc
> markups.
This suggestion is a great improvement and it's simple to apply to the
source. Where do you believe we can place this at[1]? Maybe something like
Source code documentation
-------------------------
vimc-streamer
~~~~~~~~~~~~
.. kernel-doc:: drivers/media/platform/vimc/vimc-streamer.c
:internal:
at the end of the file?
> That would make easier for the ones to read the comments and, if someone
> changes a function call, warnings will be produced, and the developer
> will be warned.
> Thanks,
> Mauro
Thanks,
André
[1]
https://git.linuxtv.org/media_tree.git/tree/Documentation/media/v4l-drivers/vimc.rst
Powered by blists - more mailing lists