linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5.2-rc5] Bluetooth: Fix regression with minimum encryption key size alignment

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190623045232.GA30005@kroah.com>
Date:   Sun, 23 Jun 2019 06:52:32 +0200
From:   Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:     Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
Cc:     Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:BLUETOOTH DRIVERS" <linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5.2-rc5] Bluetooth: Fix regression with minimum
 encryption key size alignment

On Sat, Jun 22, 2019 at 08:21:07PM +0200, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
> Hi Sasha,
> 
> > [This is an automated email]
> > 
> > This commit has been processed because it contains a "Fixes:" tag,
> > fixing commit: d5bb334a8e17 Bluetooth: Align minimum encryption key size for LE and BR/EDR connections.
> > 
> > The bot has tested the following trees: v5.1.12, v4.19.53, v4.14.128, v4.9.182, v4.4.182.
> > 
> > v5.1.12: Build failed! Errors:
> >    net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c:1356:24: error: ‘HCI_MIN_ENC_KEY_SIZE’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘SMP_MIN_ENC_KEY_SIZE’?
> > 
> > v4.19.53: Build failed! Errors:
> >    net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c:1355:24: error: ‘HCI_MIN_ENC_KEY_SIZE’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘SMP_MIN_ENC_KEY_SIZE’?
> > 
> > v4.14.128: Build failed! Errors:
> >    net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c:1355:24: error: ‘HCI_MIN_ENC_KEY_SIZE’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘SMP_MIN_ENC_KEY_SIZE’?
> > 
> > v4.9.182: Build OK!
> > v4.4.182: Build OK!
> > 
> > How should we proceed with this patch?
> 
> either you reapply commit d5bb334a8e17 first or I have to send a version that combines both into a single commit for easy applying.

I can reapply it...

thanks,

greg k-h