linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 00/25] Unify vDSOs across more architectures

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 24 Jun 2019 16:18:28 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>
cc:     linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
        LAK <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
        Paul Burton <paul.burton@...s.com>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        Mark Salyzyn <salyzyn@...roid.com>,
        Peter Collingbourne <pcc@...gle.com>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@...il.com>,
        Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
        Huw Davies <huw@...eweavers.com>,
        Shijith Thotton <sthotton@...vell.com>,
        Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>,
        Dmitry Safonov <dima@...sta.com>,
        Andrei Vagin <avagin@...nvz.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Michael Kelley <mikelley@...rosoft.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/25] Unify vDSOs across more architectures

Vincenzo,

On Mon, 24 Jun 2019, Thomas Gleixner wrote:

> I did not merge the ARM and MIPS parts as they lack any form of
> acknowlegment from their maintainers. Please talk to those folks. If they
> ack/review the changes then I can pick them up and they go into 5.3 or they
> have to go in a later cycle. Nevertheless it was well worth the trouble to
> have those conversions done to confirm that the new common library fits a
> bunch of different architectures.

I talked to Russell King and he suggested to file the ARM parts into his
patch system and he'll pick them up after 5.3-rc1.

   https://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/

I paged out how to deal with it, but you'll surely manage :)

Thanks,

	tglx