linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2 v9] serial: mctrl_gpio: Check if GPIO property exisits before requesting it

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMuHMdWeX6=SuSPVUB=WaYMsUbrmg5sraM=APeXsqr_Yv6u4AA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 24 Jun 2019 17:35:26 +0200
From:   Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To:     Stefan Roese <sr@...x.de>
Cc:     "open list:SERIAL DRIVERS" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Yegor Yefremov <yegorslists@...glemail.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Giulio Benetti <giulio.benetti@...ronovasrl.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v9] serial: mctrl_gpio: Check if GPIO property exisits
 before requesting it

Hi Stefan,

On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 5:29 PM Stefan Roese <sr@...x.de> wrote:
> On 24.06.19 10:42, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 8:24 AM Stefan Roese <sr@...x.de> wrote:
> >> This patch adds a check for the GPIOs property existence, before the
> >> GPIO is requested. This fixes an issue seen when the 8250 mctrl_gpio
> >> support is added (2nd patch in this patch series) on x86 platforms using
> >> ACPI.
> >>
> >> Here Mika's comments from 2016-08-09:
> >>
> >> "
> >> I noticed that with v4.8-rc1 serial console of some of our Broxton
> >> systems does not work properly anymore. I'm able to see output but input
> >> does not work.
> >>
> >> I bisected it down to commit 4ef03d328769eddbfeca1f1c958fdb181a69c341
> >> ("tty/serial/8250: use mctrl_gpio helpers").
> >>
> >> The reason why it fails is that in ACPI we do not have names for GPIOs
> >> (except when _DSD is used) so we use the "idx" to index into _CRS GPIO
> >> resources. Now mctrl_gpio_init_noauto() goes through a list of GPIOs
> >> calling devm_gpiod_get_index_optional() passing "idx" of 0 for each. The
> >> UART device in Broxton has following (simplified) ACPI description:
> >>
> >>      Device (URT4)
> >>      {
> >>          ...
> >>          Name (_CRS, ResourceTemplate () {
> >>              GpioIo (Exclusive, PullDefault, 0x0000, 0x0000, IoRestrictionOutputOnly,
> >>                      "\\_SB.GPO0", 0x00, ResourceConsumer)
> >>              {
> >>                  0x003A
> >>              }
> >>              GpioIo (Exclusive, PullDefault, 0x0000, 0x0000, IoRestrictionOutputOnly,
> >>                      "\\_SB.GPO0", 0x00, ResourceConsumer)
> >>              {
> >>                  0x003D
> >>              }
> >>          })
> >>
> >> In this case it finds the first GPIO (0x003A which happens to be RX pin
> >> for that UART), turns it into GPIO which then breaks input for the UART
> >> device. This also breaks systems with bluetooth connected to UART (those
> >> typically have some GPIOs in their _CRS).
> >>
> >> Any ideas how to fix this?
> >>
> >> We cannot just drop the _CRS index lookup fallback because that would
> >> break many existing machines out there so maybe we can limit this to
> >> only DT enabled machines. Or alternatively probe if the property first
> >> exists before trying to acquire the GPIOs (using
> >> device_property_present()).
> >> "
> >>
> >> This patch implements the fix suggested by Mika in his statement above.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese <sr@...x.de>

> >> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/serial_mctrl_gpio.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/serial_mctrl_gpio.c

> >> @@ -116,6 +117,19 @@ struct mctrl_gpios *mctrl_gpio_init_noauto(struct device *dev, unsigned int idx)
> >>
> >>          for (i = 0; i < UART_GPIO_MAX; i++) {
> >>                  enum gpiod_flags flags;
> >> +               char *gpio_str;
> >> +               bool present;
> >> +
> >> +               /* Check if GPIO property exists and continue if not */
> >> +               gpio_str = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%s-gpios",
> >> +                                    mctrl_gpios_desc[i].name);
> >
> > This will silently break DTBs using "(cts|dsr|dcd|rng|rts|dtr)-gpio" instead
> > of "(cts|dsr|dcd|rng|rts|dtr)-gpios".
>
> Should both options be supported ("cts-gpio" vs "cts-gpios")?
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/serial.txt only mentions
> the "-gpios" variant.

Well, the "-gpio" variant is deprecated, but still supported by
devm_gpiod_get_index_optional(), and there are active users in upstream
DTS files.

My main objection is (trying to) replicate the matching logic inside
gpiolib.c, causing subtle semantic differences. And keeping it consistent,
of course.

It would be nice if this could be fixed inside acpi_find_gpio(), so
users don't need to be updated.  There may be other subsystems where
the difference between DT and ACPI may cause issues, unbeknownst.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds