[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190624184952.GA8743@krava>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 20:49:52 +0200
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...el.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
David Carrillo-Cisneros <davidcc@...gle.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Tom Vaden <tom.vaden@....com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Alok Kataria <akataria@...are.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] perf/x86/intel: Disable check_msr for real hw
On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 11:38:06AM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > Tom, plz correctme if I'm wrongm but AFAIK because the LBR tracing is
> > enabled during the boot the lbr_from/lbr_to registers will fail the
> > check_msr 'val_new != val_tmp' check
>
> Ok this should be handleable. It should be enough to check
> the ctrl register, if that working likely we don't need
> to check the data registers which might be changing.
if the control register check is enough, we should be ok then,
I'll send new version
thanks,
jirka
Powered by blists - more mailing lists