[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190624193123.GI3436@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 21:31:23 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf/x86/intel: Mark expected switch fall-throughs
On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 11:19:13AM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch
> cases where we are expecting to fall through.
>
> This patch fixes the following warnings:
>
> arch/x86/events/intel/core.c: In function ‘intel_pmu_init’:
> arch/x86/events/intel/core.c:4959:8: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
> pmem = true;
> ~~~~~^~~~~~
> arch/x86/events/intel/core.c:4960:2: note: here
> case INTEL_FAM6_SKYLAKE_MOBILE:
> ^~~~
> arch/x86/events/intel/core.c:5008:8: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
> pmem = true;
> ~~~~~^~~~~~
> arch/x86/events/intel/core.c:5009:2: note: here
> case INTEL_FAM6_ICELAKE_MOBILE:
> ^~~~
>
> Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3
>
> This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enable
> -Wimplicit-fallthrough.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
I still consider it an abomination that the C parser looks at comments
-- other than to delete them, but OK I suppose, I'll take it.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists