linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 19/22] iommu/vt-d: Clean up for SVM device list

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190624165951.0646b788@jacob-builder>
Date:   Mon, 24 Jun 2019 16:59:51 -0700
From:   Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>
Cc:     <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
        "Eric Auger" <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
        Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
        Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe.brucker@....com>,
        "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
        Raj Ashok <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
        Andriy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 19/22] iommu/vt-d: Clean up for SVM device list

On Tue, 18 Jun 2019 17:42:37 +0100
Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com> wrote:

> On Sun, 9 Jun 2019 06:44:19 -0700
> Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> 
> > Use combined macro for_each_svm_dev() to simplify SVM device
> > iteration.
> > 
> > Suggested-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/iommu/intel-svm.c | 79
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------ 1 file changed, 39
> > insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel-svm.c b/drivers/iommu/intel-svm.c
> > index 9cbcc1f..66d98e1 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/intel-svm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel-svm.c
> > @@ -225,6 +225,9 @@ static const struct mmu_notifier_ops
> > intel_mmuops = { 
> >  static DEFINE_MUTEX(pasid_mutex);
> >  static LIST_HEAD(global_svm_list);
> > +#define for_each_svm_dev() \
> > +	list_for_each_entry(sdev, &svm->devs, list)	\
> > +	if (dev == sdev->dev)				\  
> 
> Could we make this macro less opaque and have it take the svm and dev
> as arguments?
> 
sounds good, it makes the code more readable.