lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 24 Jun 2019 07:52:44 +0200
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:     "Darrick J . Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
Cc:     Damien Le Moal <Damien.LeMoal@....com>,
        Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@...hat.com>,
        linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 03/12] xfs: fix a comment typo in xfs_submit_ioend

The fail argument is long gone, update the comment.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
---
 fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
index 9cceb90e77c5..dc60aec0c5a7 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
@@ -626,7 +626,7 @@ xfs_map_blocks(
  * reference to the ioend to ensure that the ioend completion is only done once
  * all bios have been submitted and the ioend is really done.
  *
- * If @fail is non-zero, it means that we have a situation where some part of
+ * If @status is non-zero, it means that we have a situation where some part of
  * the submission process has failed after we have marked paged for writeback
  * and unlocked them. In this situation, we need to fail the bio and ioend
  * rather than submit it to IO. This typically only happens on a filesystem
-- 
2.20.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ