[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <86d0j3pfga.wl-marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 09:15:01 +0100
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
To: Sowjanya Komatineni <skomatineni@...dia.com>
Cc: <thierry.reding@...il.com>, <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
<tglx@...utronix.de>, <jason@...edaemon.net>,
<linus.walleij@...aro.org>, <stefan@...er.ch>,
<mark.rutland@....com>, <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>,
<pgaikwad@...dia.com>, <sboyd@...nel.org>,
<linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
<jckuo@...dia.com>, <josephl@...dia.com>, <talho@...dia.com>,
<linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<mperttunen@...dia.com>, <spatra@...dia.com>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
<digetx@...il.com>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 13/18] soc/tegra: pmc: allow support for more tegra wake
On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 04:02:54 +0100,
Sowjanya Komatineni <skomatineni@...dia.com> wrote:
>
> This patch allows to create separate irq_set_wake and irq_set_type
> implementations for different tegra designs PMC that has different
> wake models which require difference wake registers and different
> programming sequence.
>
> AOWAKE model support is available for Tegra186 and Tegra194 only
> and it resides within PMC and supports tiered wake architecture.
>
> Tegra210 and prior tegra designs uses PMC directly to receive wake
> events and coordinate the wake sequence.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sowjanya Komatineni <skomatineni@...dia.com>
> ---
> drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c | 14 ++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c b/drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c
> index edd4fe06810f..e87f29a35fcf 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c
> @@ -226,6 +226,8 @@ struct tegra_pmc_soc {
> void (*setup_irq_polarity)(struct tegra_pmc *pmc,
> struct device_node *np,
> bool invert);
> + int (*irq_set_wake)(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int on);
> + int (*irq_set_type)(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int type);
>
> const char * const *reset_sources;
> unsigned int num_reset_sources;
> @@ -1919,7 +1921,7 @@ static const struct irq_domain_ops tegra_pmc_irq_domain_ops = {
> .alloc = tegra_pmc_irq_alloc,
> };
>
> -static int tegra_pmc_irq_set_wake(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int on)
> +static int tegra186_pmc_irq_set_wake(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int on)
> {
> struct tegra_pmc *pmc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
> unsigned int offset, bit;
> @@ -1951,7 +1953,7 @@ static int tegra_pmc_irq_set_wake(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int on)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static int tegra_pmc_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int type)
> +static int tegra186_pmc_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int type)
> {
> struct tegra_pmc *pmc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
> u32 value;
> @@ -2005,8 +2007,10 @@ static int tegra_pmc_irq_init(struct tegra_pmc *pmc)
> pmc->irq.irq_unmask = irq_chip_unmask_parent;
> pmc->irq.irq_eoi = irq_chip_eoi_parent;
> pmc->irq.irq_set_affinity = irq_chip_set_affinity_parent;
> - pmc->irq.irq_set_type = tegra_pmc_irq_set_type;
> - pmc->irq.irq_set_wake = tegra_pmc_irq_set_wake;
> + if (pmc->soc->irq_set_type)
> + pmc->irq.irq_set_type = pmc->soc->irq_set_type;
> + if (pmc->soc->irq_set_wake)
> + pmc->irq.irq_set_wake = pmc->soc->irq_set_wake;
I already commented on how superfluous these 'if ()' where. If you
disagree, please let me know why.
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead, it just smells funny.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists