[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0ce0d1ca-154d-fca3-f739-573ecbd2b0db@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 10:53:28 +0200
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: viresh.kumar@...aro.org
Cc: edubezval@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
"open list:CPU FREQUENCY SCALING FRAMEWORK"
<linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] cpufreq: Use existing stub functions instead of
IS_ENABLED macro
Hi Viresh,
On 21/06/2019 15:22, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> The functions stub already exist for the condition the IS_ENABLED
> is trying to avoid.
>
> Remove the IS_ENABLED macros as they are pointless.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
what about this one?
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 6 ++----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> index 85ff958e01f1..7c72f7d3509c 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> @@ -1378,8 +1378,7 @@ static int cpufreq_online(unsigned int cpu)
> if (cpufreq_driver->ready)
> cpufreq_driver->ready(policy);
>
> - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CPU_THERMAL) &&
> - cpufreq_driver->flags & CPUFREQ_IS_COOLING_DEV)
> + if (cpufreq_driver->flags & CPUFREQ_IS_COOLING_DEV)
> policy->cdev = of_cpufreq_cooling_register(policy);
>
> pr_debug("initialization complete\n");
> @@ -1469,8 +1468,7 @@ static int cpufreq_offline(unsigned int cpu)
> goto unlock;
> }
>
> - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CPU_THERMAL) &&
> - cpufreq_driver->flags & CPUFREQ_IS_COOLING_DEV) {
> + if (cpufreq_driver->flags & CPUFREQ_IS_COOLING_DEV) {
> cpufreq_cooling_unregister(policy->cdev);
> policy->cdev = NULL;
> }
>
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists