linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/6] thermal/drivers/cpu_cooling: Unregister with the policy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 24 Jun 2019 15:09:37 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:     Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Cc:     edubezval@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@...il.com>,
        Javi Merino <javi.merino@...nel.org>,
        Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
        Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
        NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
        Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>,
        "open list:CPU FREQUENCY DRIVERS - ARM BIG LITTLE" 
        <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "open list:TI BANDGAP AND THERMAL DRIVER" 
        <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] thermal/drivers/cpu_cooling: Unregister with the
 policy

On 24-06-19, 09:45, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> Actually I'm asking your opinion :)
> 
> The structure in drivers/thermal/imx_thermal.c
> 
> struct imx_thermal_data {
>         struct cpufreq_policy *policy; <<<< in the thermal data ?!
> 	[ ... ]
> };
> 
> And then:
> 
> #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ
> /*
>  * Create cooling device in case no #cooling-cells property is available in
>  * CPU node
>  */
> static int imx_thermal_register_legacy_cooling(struct imx_thermal_data
> *data)
> {
>         struct device_node *np;
>         int ret;
> 
>         data->policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(0);
>         if (!data->policy) {
>                 pr_debug("%s: CPUFreq policy not found\n", __func__);
>                 return -EPROBE_DEFER;
>         }
> 
>         np = of_get_cpu_node(data->policy->cpu, NULL);
> 
>         if (!np || !of_find_property(np, "#cooling-cells", NULL)) {
>                 data->cdev = cpufreq_cooling_register(data->policy);
>                 if (IS_ERR(data->cdev)) {
>                         ret = PTR_ERR(data->cdev);
>                         cpufreq_cpu_put(data->policy);
>                         return ret;
>                 }
>         }
> 
>         return 0;
> }
> 
> [ ... ]
> 
> Shouldn't this be move in the drivers/cpufreq/<whatever driver> ?

Sure, we have platform specific drivers where this can be moved :)

-- 
viresh