[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <39ae399a-c606-c6de-f84d-35e39d0410c0@metux.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 12:05:42 +0200
From: "Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult" <lkml@...ux.net>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
linux-gpio <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: Adjust scope for CONFIG_HAS_IOMEM before
devm_platform_ioremap_resource()
On 24.06.19 10:29, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> pt., 14 cze 2019 o 18:50 Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de> napisał(a):
>>
>> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
>> Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 17:45:13 +0200
>>
>> Move the preprocessor statement “#ifdef CONFIG_HAS_IOMEM” so that
>> the corresponding scope for conditional compilation includes also comments
>> for this function implementation.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
>> ---
>> drivers/base/platform.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/base/platform.c b/drivers/base/platform.c
>> index 4d1729853d1a..a5f40974a6ef 100644
>> --- a/drivers/base/platform.c
>> +++ b/drivers/base/platform.c
>> @@ -78,6 +78,7 @@ struct resource *platform_get_resource(struct platform_device *dev,
>> return NULL;
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(platform_get_resource);
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAS_IOMEM
>>
>> /**
>> * devm_platform_ioremap_resource - call devm_ioremap_resource() for a platform
>> @@ -87,7 +88,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(platform_get_resource);
>> * resource management
>> * @index: resource index
>> */
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_HAS_IOMEM
>> void __iomem *devm_platform_ioremap_resource(struct platform_device *pdev,
>> unsigned int index)
>> {
>> --
>> 2.22.0
>>
>
> And what is the purpose of that?
I can imagine that this could improve readability a little bit. Maybe if
one uses same fancy ide/editor that can fold code blocks like functions
and conditionals, this patch could make the code prettier.
The patch seems pretty trivial and doesn't change any actual code, so
I don't see hard resons for rejecting it.
--mtx
--
Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
Free software and Linux embedded engineering
info@...ux.net -- +49-151-27565287
Powered by blists - more mailing lists