linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.19 73/90] powerpc/bpf: use unsigned division instruction for 64-bit operations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190624092318.795077804@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 24 Jun 2019 17:57:03 +0800
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Subject: [PATCH 4.19 73/90] powerpc/bpf: use unsigned division instruction for 64-bit operations

From: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>

commit 758f2046ea040773ae8ea7f72dd3bbd8fa984501 upstream.

BPF_ALU64 div/mod operations are currently using signed division, unlike
BPF_ALU32 operations. Fix the same. DIV64 and MOD64 overflow tests pass
with this fix.

Fixes: 156d0e290e969c ("powerpc/ebpf/jit: Implement JIT compiler for extended BPF")
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # v4.8+
Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-opcode.h |    1 +
 arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h            |    2 +-
 arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c     |    8 ++++----
 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-opcode.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-opcode.h
@@ -336,6 +336,7 @@
 #define PPC_INST_MULLI			0x1c000000
 #define PPC_INST_DIVWU			0x7c000396
 #define PPC_INST_DIVD			0x7c0003d2
+#define PPC_INST_DIVDU			0x7c000392
 #define PPC_INST_RLWINM			0x54000000
 #define PPC_INST_RLWIMI			0x50000000
 #define PPC_INST_RLDICL			0x78000000
--- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h
@@ -116,7 +116,7 @@
 				     ___PPC_RA(a) | IMM_L(i))
 #define PPC_DIVWU(d, a, b)	EMIT(PPC_INST_DIVWU | ___PPC_RT(d) |	      \
 				     ___PPC_RA(a) | ___PPC_RB(b))
-#define PPC_DIVD(d, a, b)	EMIT(PPC_INST_DIVD | ___PPC_RT(d) |	      \
+#define PPC_DIVDU(d, a, b)	EMIT(PPC_INST_DIVDU | ___PPC_RT(d) |	      \
 				     ___PPC_RA(a) | ___PPC_RB(b))
 #define PPC_AND(d, a, b)	EMIT(PPC_INST_AND | ___PPC_RA(d) |	      \
 				     ___PPC_RS(a) | ___PPC_RB(b))
--- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
@@ -372,12 +372,12 @@ static int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf
 		case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_DIV | BPF_X: /* dst /= src */
 		case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_MOD | BPF_X: /* dst %= src */
 			if (BPF_OP(code) == BPF_MOD) {
-				PPC_DIVD(b2p[TMP_REG_1], dst_reg, src_reg);
+				PPC_DIVDU(b2p[TMP_REG_1], dst_reg, src_reg);
 				PPC_MULD(b2p[TMP_REG_1], src_reg,
 						b2p[TMP_REG_1]);
 				PPC_SUB(dst_reg, dst_reg, b2p[TMP_REG_1]);
 			} else
-				PPC_DIVD(dst_reg, dst_reg, src_reg);
+				PPC_DIVDU(dst_reg, dst_reg, src_reg);
 			break;
 		case BPF_ALU | BPF_MOD | BPF_K: /* (u32) dst %= (u32) imm */
 		case BPF_ALU | BPF_DIV | BPF_K: /* (u32) dst /= (u32) imm */
@@ -405,7 +405,7 @@ static int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf
 				break;
 			case BPF_ALU64:
 				if (BPF_OP(code) == BPF_MOD) {
-					PPC_DIVD(b2p[TMP_REG_2], dst_reg,
+					PPC_DIVDU(b2p[TMP_REG_2], dst_reg,
 							b2p[TMP_REG_1]);
 					PPC_MULD(b2p[TMP_REG_1],
 							b2p[TMP_REG_1],
@@ -413,7 +413,7 @@ static int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf
 					PPC_SUB(dst_reg, dst_reg,
 							b2p[TMP_REG_1]);
 				} else
-					PPC_DIVD(dst_reg, dst_reg,
+					PPC_DIVDU(dst_reg, dst_reg,
 							b2p[TMP_REG_1]);
 				break;
 			}