linux-kernel - [PATCH] x86/kvm/nVMCS: fix VMCLEAR when Enlightened VMCS is in use

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190624133028.3710-1-vkuznets@redhat.com>
Date:   Mon, 24 Jun 2019 15:30:28 +0200
From:   Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
To:     kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH] x86/kvm/nVMCS: fix VMCLEAR when Enlightened VMCS is in use

When Enlightened VMCS is in use, it is valid to do VMCLEAR and,
according to TLFS, this should "transition an enlightened VMCS from the
active to the non-active state". It is, however, wrong to assume that
it is only valid to do VMCLEAR for the eVMCS which is currently active
on the vCPU performing VMCLEAR.

Currently, the logic in handle_vmclear() is broken: in case, there is no
active eVMCS on the vCPU doing VMCLEAR we treat the argument as a 'normal'
VMCS and kvm_vcpu_write_guest() to the 'launch_state' field irreversibly
corrupts the memory area.

So, in case the VMCLEAR argument is not the current active eVMCS on the
vCPU, how can we know if the area it is pointing to is a normal or an
enlightened VMCS?
Thanks to the bug in Hyper-V (see commit 72aeb60c52bf7 ("KVM: nVMX: Verify
eVMCS revision id match supported eVMCS version on eVMCS VMPTRLD")) we can
not, the revision can't be used to distinguish between them. So let's
assume it is always enlightened in case enlightened vmentry is enabled in
the assist page. Also, check if vmx->nested.enlightened_vmcs_enabled to
minimize the impact for 'unenlightened' workloads.

Fixes: b8bbab928fb1 ("KVM: nVMX: implement enlightened VMPTRLD and VMCLEAR")
Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx/evmcs.c  | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx/evmcs.h  |  1 +
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c | 19 ++++++++-----------
 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/evmcs.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/evmcs.c
index 1a6b3e1581aa..eae636ec0cc8 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/evmcs.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/evmcs.c
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
 #include <linux/errno.h>
 #include <linux/smp.h>
 
+#include "../hyperv.h"
 #include "evmcs.h"
 #include "vmcs.h"
 #include "vmx.h"
@@ -309,6 +310,23 @@ void evmcs_sanitize_exec_ctrls(struct vmcs_config *vmcs_conf)
 }
 #endif
 
+bool nested_enlightened_vmentry(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *evmptr)
+{
+	struct hv_vp_assist_page assist_page;
+
+	*evmptr = -1ull;
+
+	if (unlikely(!kvm_hv_get_assist_page(vcpu, &assist_page)))
+		return false;
+
+	if (unlikely(!assist_page.enlighten_vmentry))
+		return false;
+
+	*evmptr = assist_page.current_nested_vmcs;
+
+	return true;
+}
+
 uint16_t nested_get_evmcs_version(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
        struct vcpu_vmx *vmx = to_vmx(vcpu);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/evmcs.h b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/evmcs.h
index e0fcef85b332..c449e79a9c4a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/evmcs.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/evmcs.h
@@ -195,6 +195,7 @@ static inline void evmcs_sanitize_exec_ctrls(struct vmcs_config *vmcs_conf) {}
 static inline void evmcs_touch_msr_bitmap(void) {}
 #endif /* IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HYPERV) */
 
+bool nested_enlightened_vmentry(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *evmptr);
 uint16_t nested_get_evmcs_version(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 int nested_enable_evmcs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 			uint16_t *vmcs_version);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
index 9214b3aea1f9..ee8dda7d8a03 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
@@ -1765,26 +1765,21 @@ static int nested_vmx_handle_enlightened_vmptrld(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 						 bool from_launch)
 {
 	struct vcpu_vmx *vmx = to_vmx(vcpu);
-	struct hv_vp_assist_page assist_page;
+	u64 evmptr;
 
 	if (likely(!vmx->nested.enlightened_vmcs_enabled))
 		return 1;
 
-	if (unlikely(!kvm_hv_get_assist_page(vcpu, &assist_page)))
+	if (!nested_enlightened_vmentry(vcpu, &evmptr))
 		return 1;
 
-	if (unlikely(!assist_page.enlighten_vmentry))
-		return 1;
-
-	if (unlikely(assist_page.current_nested_vmcs !=
-		     vmx->nested.hv_evmcs_vmptr)) {
-
+	if (unlikely(evmptr != vmx->nested.hv_evmcs_vmptr)) {
 		if (!vmx->nested.hv_evmcs)
 			vmx->nested.current_vmptr = -1ull;
 
 		nested_release_evmcs(vcpu);
 
-		if (kvm_vcpu_map(vcpu, gpa_to_gfn(assist_page.current_nested_vmcs),
+		if (kvm_vcpu_map(vcpu, gpa_to_gfn(evmptr),
 				 &vmx->nested.hv_evmcs_map))
 			return 0;
 
@@ -1826,7 +1821,7 @@ static int nested_vmx_handle_enlightened_vmptrld(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 		 */
 		vmx->nested.hv_evmcs->hv_clean_fields &=
 			~HV_VMX_ENLIGHTENED_CLEAN_FIELD_ALL;
-		vmx->nested.hv_evmcs_vmptr = assist_page.current_nested_vmcs;
+		vmx->nested.hv_evmcs_vmptr = evmptr;
 
 		/*
 		 * Unlike normal vmcs12, enlightened vmcs12 is not fully
@@ -4331,6 +4326,7 @@ static int handle_vmclear(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	struct vcpu_vmx *vmx = to_vmx(vcpu);
 	u32 zero = 0;
 	gpa_t vmptr;
+	u64 evmptr;
 
 	if (!nested_vmx_check_permission(vcpu))
 		return 1;
@@ -4346,7 +4342,8 @@ static int handle_vmclear(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		return nested_vmx_failValid(vcpu,
 			VMXERR_VMCLEAR_VMXON_POINTER);
 
-	if (vmx->nested.hv_evmcs_map.hva) {
+	if (unlikely(vmx->nested.enlightened_vmcs_enabled) &&
+	    nested_enlightened_vmentry(vcpu, &evmptr)) {
 		if (vmptr == vmx->nested.hv_evmcs_vmptr)
 			nested_release_evmcs(vcpu);
 	} else {
-- 
2.20.1