[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+ASDXP2xY_7BXk6L25FVFf1yyhnXOZygYwreGYGVY7aK0TVkg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 10:26:25 -0700
From: Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
To: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Ganapathi Bhat <gbhat@...vell.com>,
Nishant Sarmukadam <nishants@...vell.com>,
Amitkumar Karwar <amitkarwar@...il.com>,
Xinming Hu <huxinming820@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mwifiex: dispatch/rotate from reorder table atomically
On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 9:45 PM Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org> wrote:
> New warning:
>
> drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/wmm.c: In function 'mwifiex_wmm_process_tx':
> drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/wmm.c:1438:4: warning: 'flags' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
> mwifiex_11n_aggregate_pkt(priv, ptr, ptr_index, flags);
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/wmm.c:1406:16: note: 'flags' was declared here
> unsigned long flags;
> ^~~~~
Yikes! Not sure how I missed that, as I *thought* I had -Werror
enabled. Maybe things got lost a bit in the shuffles from GCC to Clang
for building our kernels internally.
Anyway, "used" is a bit generous here, since these are just useless
function arguments (never *actually* used now). I should remove these
args entirely.
> 2 patches set to Changes Requested.
Will send a v2.
Thanks,
Brian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists