[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190625173316.GU8917@twin.jikos.cz>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 19:33:16 +0200
From: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.cz>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
Cc: dsterba@...e.cz, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
matthew.garrett@...ula.com, yuchao0@...wei.com, tytso@....edu,
shaggy@...nel.org, ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org, josef@...icpanda.com,
clm@...com, adilger.kernel@...ger.ca, jk@...abs.org, jack@...e.com,
dsterba@...e.com, jaegeuk@...nel.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
cluster-devel@...hat.com, jfs-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
reiserfs-devel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-nilfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] vfs: create a generic checking function for
FS_IOC_FSSETXATTR
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 10:16:16AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 07:02:48PM +0200, David Sterba wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 03:57:25AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 04:56:29PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > > > From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
> > > >
> > > > Create a generic checking function for the incoming FS_IOC_FSSETXATTR
> > > > fsxattr values so that we can standardize some of the implementation
> > > > behaviors.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
> > > > ---
> > > > fs/btrfs/ioctl.c | 21 +++++++++-------
> > > > fs/ext4/ioctl.c | 27 ++++++++++++++------
> > > > fs/f2fs/file.c | 26 ++++++++++++++-----
> > > > fs/inode.c | 17 +++++++++++++
> > > > fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
> > > > include/linux/fs.h | 3 ++
> > > > 6 files changed, 111 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
> > > > index f408aa93b0cf..7ddda5b4b6a6 100644
> > > > --- a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
> > > > +++ b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
> > > > @@ -366,6 +366,13 @@ static int check_xflags(unsigned int flags)
> > > > return 0;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > +static void __btrfs_ioctl_fsgetxattr(struct btrfs_inode *binode,
> > > > + struct fsxattr *fa)
> > > > +{
> > > > + memset(fa, 0, sizeof(*fa));
> > > > + fa->fsx_xflags = btrfs_inode_flags_to_xflags(binode->flags);
> > >
> > > Is there really much of a point in this helper? Epeciall as
> > > the zeroing could easily be done in the variable declaration
> > > line using
> > >
> > > struct fsxattr fa = { };
> >
> > Agreed, not counting the initialization the wrapper is merely another
> > name for btrfs_inode_flags_to_xflags. I also find it slightly confusing
> > that __btrfs_ioctl_fsgetxattr name is too close to the ioctl callback
> > implementation btrfs_ioctl_fsgetxattr but only does some initialization.
>
> Ok; it's easily enough changed to:
>
> struct fsxattr old_fa = {
> .fsx_xflags = btrfs_inode_flags_to_xflags(binode->flags),
> };
Works for me, thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists