linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 5/9] dt-bindings: vendor-prefixes: add SoChip

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAL_Jsq+w-+cRwfAMu=kZPK=e85ujq8hu9Lh=jjf+Qy=R7C-AQA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 25 Jun 2019 11:39:01 -0600
From:   Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:     Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@...c.io>,
        Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>,
        Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-sunxi <linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/9] dt-bindings: vendor-prefixes: add SoChip

On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 7:55 AM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jun 23, 2019 at 6:39 AM Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@...c.io> wrote:
>
> > Shenzhen SoChip Technology Co., Ltd. is a hardware vendor that produces
> > EVBs with Allwinner chips. There's also a SoC named S3 that is developed
> > by Allwinner (based on Allwinner V3/V3s) but branded SoChip.
> >
> > Add the vendor prefix for SoChip.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@...c.io>
> > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> > ---
> > No changes in v3.
> >
> > Changes in v2:
> > - Add the review tag by Rob.
>
> Should I apply this to the pinctrl tree? Rob?

I'd like to take these 2 because we have lots of vendor prefix changes
(adding a bunch of undocumented ones) this cycle.

Rob