[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190625180525.GA119831@archlinux-epyc>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 11:05:25 -0700
From: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <x86@...nel.org>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Shawn Landden <shawn@....icu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf/x86/intel: Mark expected switch fall-throughs
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 10:12:42AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 09:18:46AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Can it build a kernel without patches yet? That is, why should I care
> > what LLVM does?
>
> Yes. LLVM trunk builds and boots x86 now. As for distro availability,
> AIUI, the asm-goto feature missed the 9.0 LLVM branch point, so it'll
> appear in the following release.
>
> --
> Kees Cook
I don't think that's right. LLVM 9 hasn't been branched yet so it should
make it in.
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-June/133155.html
If anyone wants to play around with it before then, we wrote a
self-contained script that will build an LLVM toolchain suitable for
kernel development:
https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/tc-build
Cheers,
Nathan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists