[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALvZod7EZYZJR68dqKF7V9xdgeYo8YnssR94O5zku9qii+xJPA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 11:33:23 -0700
From: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
To: Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Team <kernel-team@...com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 07/10] mm: synchronize access to kmem_cache dying flag
using a spinlock
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 4:18 PM Roman Gushchin <guro@...com> wrote:
>
> Currently the memcg_params.dying flag and the corresponding
> workqueue used for the asynchronous deactivation of kmem_caches
> is synchronized using the slab_mutex.
>
> It makes impossible to check this flag from the irq context,
> which will be required in order to implement asynchronous release
> of kmem_caches.
>
> So let's switch over to the irq-save flavor of the spinlock-based
> synchronization.
>
> Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>
Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists