[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <201906251312.5059C51334@keescook>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 13:18:22 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>,
Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
linux-kbuild <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] video: fbdev: s3c-fb: Mark expected switch fall-throughs
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 10:49:01AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-06-25 at 10:31 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 09:52:23AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2019-06-25 at 11:01 -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> > > > In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch
> > > > cases where we are expecting to fall through.
> > > []
> > > > This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enable
> > > > -Wimplicit-fallthrough.
> > >
> > > Just enable the thing already.
> >
> > Linus has been pretty clear about not wanting warning options enabled
> > without first fixing all the cases it warns about first.
>
> Hey Kees.
>
> I don't recall that particular tidbit. Got a link?
It was spread out over the discussion around removing __deprecated,
about enabling -Wvla, and in person at the kernel summit when asking
what approach to take for -Wimplicit-fallthrough.
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists