[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3ae4c1a4a72f8ee6b75c45adfbe543fc0a7b5da1.camel@perches.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 22:01:30 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Alastair D'Silva <alastair@....ibm.com>, alastair@...ilva.org
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
Karsten Keil <isdn@...ux-pingi.de>,
Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com>,
Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>,
Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
ath10k@...ts.infradead.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/7] Hexdump Enhancements
On Tue, 2019-06-25 at 13:17 +1000, Alastair D'Silva wrote:
> From: Alastair D'Silva <alastair@...ilva.org>
>
> Apologies for the large CC list, it's a heads up for those responsible
> for subsystems where a prototype change in generic code causes a change
> in those subsystems.
[]
> The default behaviour of hexdump is unchanged, however, the prototype
> for hex_dump_to_buffer() has changed, and print_hex_dump() has been
> renamed to print_hex_dump_ext(), with a wrapper replacing it for
> compatibility with existing code, which would have been too invasive to
> change.
I believe this cover letter is misleading.
The point of the wrapper is to avoid unnecessary changes
in existing
code.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists