[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8736jyfaje.fsf@codeaurora.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 09:23:33 +0300
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@...il.com>,
"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> writes:
> After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> failed like this:
>
> drivers/net/wireless/intersil/p54/txrx.c: In function 'p54_rx_data':
> drivers/net/wireless/intersil/p54/txrx.c:386:28: error: implicit declaration of function 'ktime_get_boot_ns'; did you mean 'ktime_get_raw_ns'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> rx_status->boottime_ns = ktime_get_boot_ns();
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ktime_get_raw_ns
>
> Caused by commit
>
> c11c75ec784e ("p54: Support boottime in scan results")
>
> from the wireless-drivers-next tree interacting with commit
>
> 9285ec4c8b61 ("timekeeping: Use proper clock specifier names in functions")
>
> from the tip tree.
>
> I have added the following merge fix patch:
>
> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 15:55:36 +1000
> Subject: [PATCH] p54: fix up for ktime_get_boot_ns() name change
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/intersil/p54/txrx.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/intersil/p54/txrx.c b/drivers/net/wireless/intersil/p54/txrx.c
> index be6968454282..873fea59894f 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/intersil/p54/txrx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/intersil/p54/txrx.c
> @@ -383,7 +383,7 @@ static int p54_rx_data(struct p54_common *priv, struct sk_buff *skb)
>
> fc = ((struct ieee80211_hdr *)skb->data)->frame_control;
> if (ieee80211_is_probe_resp(fc) || ieee80211_is_beacon(fc))
> - rx_status->boottime_ns = ktime_get_boot_ns();
> + rx_status->boottime_ns = ktime_get_boottime_ns();
Thanks for the report. Any suggestions how to handle this? Or do we let
Linus take care of this?
--
Kalle Valo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists