lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190625073524.GA30815@lst.de>
Date:   Tue, 25 Jun 2019 09:35:24 +0200
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Greg Ungerer <gerg@...ux-m68k.org>,
        linux-m68k <linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org>,
        Linux IOMMU <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] switch m68k to use the generic remapping DMA allocator

On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 09:26:48AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > bloat-o-meter says:
> > >
> > > add/remove: 75/0 grow/shrink: 11/6 up/down: 4122/-82 (4040)
> >
> > What do these values stand for?  The code should grow a little as
> > we now need to include the the pool allocator for the above API
> > fix.
> 
> Last 3 values are "bytes added/removed (net increase)".
> So this increases the static kernel size by ca. 4 KiB.

That seems a lot for the little bit of pool code.  Did m68k not
build lib/genalloc.c by default before?

Also I'd be curious what the first 4 values are.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ