[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190625074108.GB30815@lst.de>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 09:41:08 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Paul Burton <paul.burton@...s.com>,
James Hogan <jhogan@...nel.org>,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@...cle.com>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/16] mm: use untagged_addr() for get_user_pages_fast
addresses
On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 10:39:11AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>
> Hmm, this function, and the other, goes on to do:
>
> if (unlikely(!access_ok((void __user *)start, len)))
> return 0;
>
> and I thought that access_ok takes in the tagged pointer?
>
> How about re-order it a bit?
The patch doesn't really work as-as an misses the main
get_user_pages_fast fast path, but I'll add something equivalent.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists