linux-kernel - [tip:sched/core] sched/uclamp: Add uclamp_util

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 25 Jun 2019 01:36:26 -0700
From:   tip-bot for Patrick Bellasi <tipbot@...or.com>
To:     linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     dietmar.eggemann@....com, balsini@...roid.com,
        rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        viresh.kumar@...aro.org, mingo@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
        tkjos@...gle.com, hpa@...or.com, smuckle@...gle.com,
        vincent.guittot@...aro.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
        surenb@...gle.com, patrick.bellasi@....com, tglx@...utronix.de,
        quentin.perret@....com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        tj@...nel.org, pjt@...gle.com, morten.rasmussen@....com,
        joelaf@...gle.com
Subject: [tip:sched/core] sched/uclamp: Add uclamp_util_with()

Commit-ID:  9d20ad7dfc9a5cc64e33d725902d3863d350a66a
Gitweb:     https://git.kernel.org/tip/9d20ad7dfc9a5cc64e33d725902d3863d350a66a
Author:     Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@....com>
AuthorDate: Fri, 21 Jun 2019 09:42:11 +0100
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CommitDate: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 19:23:48 +0200

sched/uclamp: Add uclamp_util_with()

So far uclamp_util() allows to clamp a specified utilization considering
the clamp values requested by RUNNABLE tasks in a CPU. For the Energy
Aware Scheduler (EAS) it is interesting to test how clamp values will
change when a task is becoming RUNNABLE on a given CPU.
For example, EAS is interested in comparing the energy impact of
different scheduling decisions and the clamp values can play a role on
that.

Add uclamp_util_with() which allows to clamp a given utilization by
considering the possible impact on CPU clamp values of a specified task.

Signed-off-by: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@....com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Alessio Balsini <balsini@...roid.com>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>
Cc: Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@....com>
Cc: Rafael J . Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Cc: Steve Muckle <smuckle@...gle.com>
Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Todd Kjos <tkjos@...gle.com>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190621084217.8167-11-patrick.bellasi@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
---
 kernel/sched/core.c  | 13 +++++++++++++
 kernel/sched/sched.h | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 6cd5133f0c2a..fa43ce3962e7 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -880,6 +880,19 @@ uclamp_eff_get(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int clamp_id)
 	return uc_req;
 }
 
+unsigned int uclamp_eff_value(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int clamp_id)
+{
+	struct uclamp_se uc_eff;
+
+	/* Task currently refcounted: use back-annotated (effective) value */
+	if (p->uclamp[clamp_id].active)
+		return p->uclamp[clamp_id].value;
+
+	uc_eff = uclamp_eff_get(p, clamp_id);
+
+	return uc_eff.value;
+}
+
 /*
  * When a task is enqueued on a rq, the clamp bucket currently defined by the
  * task's uclamp::bucket_id is refcounted on that rq. This also immediately
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index 9b0c77a99346..1783f6b4c2e0 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -2266,11 +2266,20 @@ static inline void cpufreq_update_util(struct rq *rq, unsigned int flags) {}
 #endif /* CONFIG_CPU_FREQ */
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_UCLAMP_TASK
-static inline unsigned int uclamp_util(struct rq *rq, unsigned int util)
+unsigned int uclamp_eff_value(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int clamp_id);
+
+static __always_inline
+unsigned int uclamp_util_with(struct rq *rq, unsigned int util,
+			      struct task_struct *p)
 {
 	unsigned int min_util = READ_ONCE(rq->uclamp[UCLAMP_MIN].value);
 	unsigned int max_util = READ_ONCE(rq->uclamp[UCLAMP_MAX].value);
 
+	if (p) {
+		min_util = max(min_util, uclamp_eff_value(p, UCLAMP_MIN));
+		max_util = max(max_util, uclamp_eff_value(p, UCLAMP_MAX));
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * Since CPU's {min,max}_util clamps are MAX aggregated considering
 	 * RUNNABLE tasks with _different_ clamps, we can end up with an
@@ -2281,7 +2290,17 @@ static inline unsigned int uclamp_util(struct rq *rq, unsigned int util)
 
 	return clamp(util, min_util, max_util);
 }
+
+static inline unsigned int uclamp_util(struct rq *rq, unsigned int util)
+{
+	return uclamp_util_with(rq, util, NULL);
+}
 #else /* CONFIG_UCLAMP_TASK */
+static inline unsigned int uclamp_util_with(struct rq *rq, unsigned int util,
+					    struct task_struct *p)
+{
+	return util;
+}
 static inline unsigned int uclamp_util(struct rq *rq, unsigned int util)
 {
 	return util;