[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ccfa78f3-35c2-1d26-98b5-b21a76b90e1e@physik.fu-berlin.de>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 11:02:36 +0200
From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] remove arch/sh?
Hi Christoph!
On 6/25/19 10:56 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> arch/sh seems pretty much unmaintained these days. The last time I got
> any reply to sh patches from the list maintainers, and the last maintainer
> pull request was over a year ago, and even that has been rather sporadic.
>
> In the meantime we've not really seen any updates for new kernel features
> and code seems to be bitrotting.
We're still using sh4 in Debian and most of the stuff works fine. There is
one patch by Michael Karcher that fixes a bug in the kprobes code that someone
should pull in as it unbreaks the kernel with kprobes enabled [1].
Yoshinori Sato is still active sporadically and has a kernel tree here
where he collects patches for -next [2].
Otherwise, the kernel works fine.
Adrian
> [1] https://marc.info/?l=linux-sh&m=156034655921917&w=2
> [2] https://osdn.net/projects/uclinux-h8/scm/git/linux/
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaubitz@...ian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de
`- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
Powered by blists - more mailing lists