[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190625023137.29272-1-yuehaibing@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 10:31:37 +0800
From: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
To: <davem@...emloft.net>, <ast@...nel.org>, <daniel@...earbox.net>,
<jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>, <hawk@...nel.org>,
<john.fastabend@...il.com>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<xdp-newbies@...r.kernel.org>, <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next] xdp: Make __mem_id_disconnect static
Fix sparse warning:
net/core/xdp.c:88:6: warning:
symbol '__mem_id_disconnect' was not declared. Should it be static?
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
---
net/core/xdp.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/core/xdp.c b/net/core/xdp.c
index b29d7b5..829377c 100644
--- a/net/core/xdp.c
+++ b/net/core/xdp.c
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ static void __xdp_mem_allocator_rcu_free(struct rcu_head *rcu)
kfree(xa);
}
-bool __mem_id_disconnect(int id, bool force)
+static bool __mem_id_disconnect(int id, bool force)
{
struct xdp_mem_allocator *xa;
bool safe_to_remove = true;
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists