linux-kernel - [PATCH 3/4] b43: remove b43_dma_set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190625102932.32257-4-hch@lst.de>
Date:   Tue, 25 Jun 2019 12:29:31 +0200
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:     Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>,
        Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     b43-dev@...ts.infradead.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] b43: remove b43_dma_set_mask

These days drivers are not required to fallback to smaller DMA masks,
but can just set the largest mask they support, removing the need for
this trial and error logic.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/dma.c | 43 +++----------------------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/dma.c b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/dma.c
index b34e51933257..1d5ace4d3372 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/dma.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/dma.c
@@ -1056,42 +1056,6 @@ void b43_dma_free(struct b43_wldev *dev)
 	destroy_ring(dma, tx_ring_mcast);
 }
 
-static int b43_dma_set_mask(struct b43_wldev *dev, u64 mask)
-{
-	u64 orig_mask = mask;
-	bool fallback = false;
-	int err;
-
-	/* Try to set the DMA mask. If it fails, try falling back to a
-	 * lower mask, as we can always also support a lower one. */
-	while (1) {
-		err = dma_set_mask_and_coherent(dev->dev->dma_dev, mask);
-		if (!err)
-			break;
-		if (mask == DMA_BIT_MASK(64)) {
-			mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32);
-			fallback = true;
-			continue;
-		}
-		if (mask == DMA_BIT_MASK(32)) {
-			mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(30);
-			fallback = true;
-			continue;
-		}
-		b43err(dev->wl, "The machine/kernel does not support "
-		       "the required %u-bit DMA mask\n",
-		       (unsigned int)dma_mask_to_engine_type(orig_mask));
-		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
-	}
-	if (fallback) {
-		b43info(dev->wl, "DMA mask fallback from %u-bit to %u-bit\n",
-			(unsigned int)dma_mask_to_engine_type(orig_mask),
-			(unsigned int)dma_mask_to_engine_type(mask));
-	}
-
-	return 0;
-}
-
 /* Some hardware with 64-bit DMA seems to be bugged and looks for translation
  * bit in low address word instead of high one.
  */
@@ -1120,9 +1084,12 @@ int b43_dma_init(struct b43_wldev *dev)
 
 	dmamask = supported_dma_mask(dev);
 	type = dma_mask_to_engine_type(dmamask);
-	err = b43_dma_set_mask(dev, dmamask);
-	if (err)
+	err = dma_set_mask_and_coherent(dev->dev->dma_dev, dmamask);
+	if (err) {
+		b43err(dev->wl, "The machine/kernel does not support "
+		       "the required %u-bit DMA mask\n", type);
 		return err;
+	}
 
 	switch (dev->dev->bus_type) {
 #ifdef CONFIG_B43_BCMA
-- 
2.20.1