linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 13/16] PM / devfreq: tegra: Support Tegra30

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 25 Jun 2019 14:30:01 +0300
From:   Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
To:     myungjoo.ham@...sung.com
Cc:     Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
        "linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "jonathanh@...dia.com" <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        "thierry.reding@...il.com" <thierry.reding@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 13/16] PM / devfreq: tegra: Support Tegra30

25.06.2019 4:42, MyungJoo Ham пишет:
> Sender : Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
>> 24.06.2019 14:11, MyungJoo Ham пишет:
>>>>
>>>> --------- Original Message ---------
>>>> Sender : Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
>>>>
>>>> 24.06.2019 10:34, MyungJoo Ham пишет:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A question:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Does this driver support Tegra20 as well?
>>>>>> I'm asking this because ARCH_TEGRA includes ARCH_TEGRA_2x_SOC
>>>>>> according to /drivers/soc/tegra/Kconfig.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> For this matter, how about updating your 13/16 patch as follows?
>>>>>
>>> []
>>>>
>>>> Good call! I'll update this patch following yours suggestion, thanks.
>>>
>>> Or, you may approve the modified commits here:
>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mzx/devfreq.git/log/?h=for-next
>>
>> Looks almost good to me!
>>
>> I just recalled that there is also a 64bit variant of Tegra124, the Tegra132. Hence
>> the Tegra30+ Kconfig entry should look like this (it's also worthy to break the lines
>> for readability):
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/Kconfig b/drivers/devfreq/Kconfig
>> index ccb1a68c4b51..bd2efbc27725 100644
>> --- a/drivers/devfreq/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/devfreq/Kconfig
>> @@ -94,7 +94,10 @@ config ARM_EXYNOS_BUS_DEVFREQ
>>
>> config ARM_TEGRA_DEVFREQ
>>        tristate "NVIDIA Tegra30/114/124/210 DEVFREQ Driver"
>> -       depends on ARCH_TEGRA || COMPILE_TEST
>> +       depends on ARCH_TEGRA_3x_SOC  || ARCH_TEGRA_114_SOC || \
>> +                  ARCH_TEGRA_132_SOC || ARCH_TEGRA_124_SOC || \
>> +                  ARCH_TEGRA_210_SOC || \
>> +                  COMPILE_TEST
>>        select PM_OPP
>>        help
>>          This adds the DEVFREQ driver for the Tegra family of SoCs.
>>
>> Could you please adjust the patches like I'm suggesting? I'll approve yours change
>> then and won't re-spin the first batch of the patches.
> 
> I've adjusted as you suggested. It's pushed to the git repo as well.

Thank you very much, looking good now!