[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdYgXZzvFKyvySWnsJ2_1pA1e_VHEY-QNzNYCikMUc_WVg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 14:31:00 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: alpawi@...zon.com
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...zon.com>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] pinctl: armada-37xx: fix for pins 32+
On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 6:01 PM <alpawi@...zon.com> wrote:
> From: Patrick Williams <alpawi@...zon.com>
>
> The 37xx GPIO config registers are only 32 bits long and
> span 2 registers for the NB GPIO controller. The function
> to calculate the offset was missing the increase to the
> config register.
>
> I have tested both raw gpio access and interrupts using
> libgpiod utilities on an Espressonbin.
>
> The first patch is a simple rename of a function because
> the original name implied it was doing IO itself ("update
> reg"). This patch could be dropped if undesired.
>
> The second patch contains the fix for GPIOs 32+.
This looks good overall. I am waiting for a maintainer review.
If nothing happens in a week, poke me and I'll just apply
the patches.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists