[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190625142539.GA33175@8c859006a84e.ant.amazon.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 09:25:39 -0500
From: Patrick Williams <alpawi@...zon.com>
To: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>
CC: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...zon.com>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] pinctl: armada-37xx: fix for pins 32+
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 03:38:59PM +0200, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> First you can add my
> Acked-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>
Thanks for the review Gregory.
> Then as the second patch is a fix, you should add the fix tag: "Fixes:
> 5715092a458c ("pinctrl: armada-37xx: Add gpio support") " as well as the
> 'CC: <stable@...r.kernel.org>" tags.
>
> But your change in the first patch made this second patch more difficult
> to backport.
> ...
> Maybe you could change the order of those 2 patches?
Good points. Will do both.
> Actually, when I wrote "_update_reg" I was thinking to the update of the
> variable, whereas with a function named "_calculate_reg" I am expecting
> having the result as a return of the function.
Understand. I can see the ambiguity in both names. How about
"_update_reg_offset"?
> Thanks,
>
> Gregory
>
--
- Patrick
Powered by blists - more mailing lists