lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 25 Jun 2019 23:40:00 +0900
From:   Katsuhiro Suzuki <katsuhiro@...suster.net>
To:     Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
        Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: stmmac: Fix the case when PHY handle is not
 present

Hello Jose,

This patch works fine with my Tinker Board. Thanks a lot!

Tested-by: Katsuhiro Suzuki <katsuhiro@...suster.net>


BTW, from network guys point of view, is it better to add a phy node
into device trees that have no phy node such as the Tinker Board?


Best Regards,
Katsuhiro Suzuki


On 2019/06/25 22:11, Jose Abreu wrote:
> ++ Katsuhiro
> 
> From: Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>
> 
>> Some DT bindings do not have the PHY handle. Let's fallback to manually
>> discovery in case phylink_of_phy_connect() fails.
>>
>> Reported-by: Katsuhiro Suzuki <katsuhiro@...suster.net>
>> Fixes: 74371272f97f ("net: stmmac: Convert to phylink and remove phylib logic")
>> Signed-off-by: Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>
>> Cc: Joao Pinto <jpinto@...opsys.com>
>> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
>> Cc: Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>
>> Cc: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>
>> ---
>> Hello Katsuhiro,
>>
>> Can you please test this patch ?
>> ---
>>   drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c | 7 +++++--
>>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
>> index a48751989fa6..f4593d2d9d20 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
>> @@ -950,9 +950,12 @@ static int stmmac_init_phy(struct net_device *dev)
>>   
>>   	node = priv->plat->phylink_node;
>>   
>> -	if (node) {
>> +	if (node)
>>   		ret = phylink_of_phy_connect(priv->phylink, node, 0);
>> -	} else {
>> +
>> +	/* Some DT bindings do not set-up the PHY handle. Let's try to
>> +	 * manually parse it */
>> +	if (!node || ret) {
>>   		int addr = priv->plat->phy_addr;
>>   		struct phy_device *phydev;
>>   
>> -- 
>> 2.7.4
> 
> 
> 
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ