lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190625152120.GA8153@lst.de>
Date:   Tue, 25 Jun 2019 17:21:20 +0200
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:     "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Damien Le Moal <Damien.LeMoal@....com>,
        Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@...hat.com>,
        linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/12] xfs: initialize ioma->flags in xfs_bmbt_to_iomap

On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 08:13:57AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > This doesn't affect any existing user as they all get a zeroed iomap
> > passed from the caller in iomap.c.  It affects the writeback code
> > once it uses struct iomap as it overwrites a previously used iomap.
> 
> Then shouldn't this new writeback code zero the iomap before calling
> back into the filesystem, just to maintain consistent behavior?

The core code doesn't decide when to overwrite it, that ->map_blocks
method does that based on a few factors (including the data_seq/cow_seq
counters that are entirely inside xfs).

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ