[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7a9ce546-7c13-a7ea-ff58-c3befe2fcf6a@katsuster.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 00:26:58 +0900
From: Katsuhiro Suzuki <katsuhiro@...suster.net>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: stmmac: Fix the case when PHY handle is not
present
Hello Andrew,
On 2019/06/25 23:51, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 11:40:00PM +0900, Katsuhiro Suzuki wrote:
>> Hello Jose,
>>
>> This patch works fine with my Tinker Board. Thanks a lot!
>>
>> Tested-by: Katsuhiro Suzuki <katsuhiro@...suster.net>
>>
>>
>> BTW, from network guys point of view, is it better to add a phy node
>> into device trees that have no phy node such as the Tinker Board?
>
> Hi Katsuhiro
>
> It makes it less ambiguous if there is a phy-handle. It is then very
> clear which PHY should be used. For a development board, which people
> can be tinkering around with, there is a chance they add a second PHY
> to the MDIO bus, or an Ethernet switch, etc. Without explicitly
> listing the PHY, it might get the wrong one. However this is generally
> a problem if phy_find_first() is used. I think in this case, something
> is setting priv->plat->phy_addr, so it is also clearly defined which
> PHY to use.
>
> Andrew
>
Hmm, I see. This stmmac driver can choose PHY by the kernel module
parameter 'phyaddr' (if no one set this parameter, priv->plat->phy_addr
goes to 0). So there is no ambiguous in this case and need no changes
for device tree.
Thank you for your comment.
Best Regards,
Katsuhiro Suzuki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists