[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190625162058.GB23880@lenoir>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 18:20:59 +0200
From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] time/tick-broadcast: Fix tick_broadcast_offline()
lockdep complaint
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 07:16:24AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 04:05:38PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 06:54:30AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > And it allows dispensing with the initialization. How about like
> > > the following?
> >
> > Looks good to me!
>
> Limited rcutorture testing looking good thus far. Here is hoping!
>
> Frederic, you OK with this approach?
Yep, all good!
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists