[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrWWzk+kHJorkVZAdAm90nYUbS+zgvDxqp5KRvf8vU_xqg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 11:21:54 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
To: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] KVM: x86: Provide paravirtualized flush_tlb_multi()
On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 10:41 AM Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org> writes:
>
> > All this being said, do we currently have any system that supports
> > PCID *and* remote flushes? I guess KVM has some mechanism, but I'm
> > not that familiar with its exact capabilities. If I remember right,
> > Hyper-V doesn't expose PCID yet.
> >
>
> It already does (and support it to certain extent), see
>
> commit 617ab45c9a8900e64a78b43696c02598b8cad68b
> Author: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
> Date: Wed Jan 24 11:36:29 2018 +0100
>
> x86/hyperv: Stop suppressing X86_FEATURE_PCID
>
Hmm. Once the dust settles from Nadav's patches, I think we should
see about supporting it better :)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists