linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] x86/entry: Simplify _TIF_SYSCALL

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1906262044320.32342@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date:   Wed, 26 Jun 2019 20:45:00 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
cc:     Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>, jdike@...toit.com,
        Steve Capper <Steve.Capper@....com>,
        Haibo Xu <haibo.xu@....com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] x86/entry: Simplify _TIF_SYSCALL_EMU handling

On Mon, 24 Jun 2019, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Jun 2019, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 03:56:27PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > > The usage of emulated and _TIF_SYSCALL_EMU flags in syscall_trace_enter
> > > is more complicated than required.
> > > 
> > > Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
> > > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
> > > Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
> > > Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> > > Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
> > > ---
> > >  arch/x86/entry/common.c | 17 ++++++-----------
> > >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > Hi Catalin,
> > > 
> > > I assume you can now pick up this patch.
> > 
> > I can, unless Thomas picks it up through the tip tree (there is no
> > dependency on the other patches in this series, which I already queued
> > via arm64).
> 
> Last time I checked I had no dependencies either. I'll recheck later
> tonight.

Forgot of course. But go ahead and route it with the others.

Thanks,

	tglx