linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/4] iio: frequency: adf4371: Add support for output stage mute

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAL_JsqLmXi6Uy9W0tXX87tHuV99H05_+yc98mRUmX_JA0bG=4Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 26 Jun 2019 14:04:40 -0600
From:   Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
To:     Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
Cc:     Stefan Popa <stefan.popa@...log.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        Peter Meerwald <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
        Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "open list:IIO SUBSYSTEM AND DRIVERS" <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] iio: frequency: adf4371: Add support for output stage mute

On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 1:48 PM Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 18:13:56 +0300
> Stefan Popa <stefan.popa@...log.com> wrote:
>
> > Another feature of the ADF4371/ADF4372 is that the supply current to the
> > RF8P and RF8N output stage can shut down until the ADF4371 achieves lock
> > as measured by the digital lock detect circuitry. The mute to lock
> > detect bit (MUTE_LD) in REG25 enables this function.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stefan Popa <stefan.popa@...log.com>
> Bit of fuzz on this due to me ignoring patch 1 for now.
>
> Rob probably missed the binding as it was buried inside a patch that wasn't
> clearly labelled and it is unlike him to review part of the bindings in
> a series.

I wrote my reply this morning, but then got distracted with why the
meta-schema didn't catch the problem of missing a type definition. Now
it will once I commit it and fix the other cases that we already have.

Rob