[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e16caf5b98aafea4033bfc0e49845ef987c02678.camel@d-silva.org>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 11:02:29 +1000
From: "Alastair D'Silva" <alastair@...ilva.org>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
Karsten Keil <isdn@...ux-pingi.de>,
Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com>,
Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>,
Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
ath10k@...ts.infradead.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/7] Hexdump Enhancements
On Mon, 2019-06-24 at 22:01 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-06-25 at 13:17 +1000, Alastair D'Silva wrote:
> > From: Alastair D'Silva <alastair@...ilva.org>
> >
> > Apologies for the large CC list, it's a heads up for those
> > responsible
> > for subsystems where a prototype change in generic code causes a
> > change
> > in those subsystems.
> []
> > The default behaviour of hexdump is unchanged, however, the
> > prototype
> > for hex_dump_to_buffer() has changed, and print_hex_dump() has been
> > renamed to print_hex_dump_ext(), with a wrapper replacing it for
> > compatibility with existing code, which would have been too
> > invasive to
> > change.
>
> I believe this cover letter is misleading.
>
> The point of the wrapper is to avoid unnecessary changes
> in existing
> code.
>
>
The wrapper is for print_hex_dump(), which has many callers.
The changes to existing code are for hex_dump_to_buffer(), which is
called in relatively few places.
--
Alastair D'Silva mob: 0423 762 819
skype: alastair_dsilva
Twitter: @EvilDeece
blog: http://alastair.d-silva.org
Powered by blists - more mailing lists