linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] Associate ddc adapters with connectors

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3fb19371-db7d-f9dc-31a7-1ccd126f6784@collabora.com>
Date:   Wed, 26 Jun 2019 08:50:47 +0200
From:   Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzej.p@...labora.com>
To:     Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Emil Velikov <emil.velikov@...labora.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
        Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@...sung.com>,
        Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>,
        Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
        Seung-Woo Kim <sw0312.kim@...sung.com>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
        Inki Dae <inki.dae@...sung.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
        Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        kernel@...labora.com, Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, m.szyprowski@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Associate ddc adapters with connectors

W dniu 25.06.2019 o 16:20, Daniel Vetter pisze:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 03:10:32PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 04:07:55PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>> Otherwise I like this. Biggest problem I'm seeing here is rolling this out
>>> everywhere, this is a lot of work. And without widespread adoptions it's
>>> not terribly useful for userspace.
>>
>> There will be cases where it's not possible, because the I2C bus is
>> hidden behind a chip that doesn't give you direct access to the DDC
>> bus.
> 
> Oh sure, plus lots of connectors where there's just not ddc bus at all.
> But if we only roll this out for a handful of drivers it's also not great,
> that's what I meant. Looking at
> 
> $ git grep drm_do_get_edid
> 
> there's only very few drivers where the ddc bus is hidden. There's a lot
> more where it's not, and I think a big series to tackle those would serve
> extremely well to make a case for this sysfs link.
> -Daniel
> 

I will respond with a v3 then, including as many drivers as possible.
Those will be compile-tested only, though.

Andrzej